Improving your academic writing: My top 10 tips The topic of academic writing has been popular in the blogosphere and Twittersphere in the past couple of weeks. Yes, I also know that I linked to political science and public policy professors. There are two reasons for this.
He believes that the PhD experience can and should be far better supported in Australia, and that early career researchers can help create a healthier research culture for ourselves into the future. Nonetheless, I want to share some numbers based on a detailed tally of where I spent my time during my PhD.
My reason for doing this is to firstly show how surprisingly variable this pattern can be, and secondly, to argue that doing things beyond your core PhD work can be extremely important and beneficial. My PhD timeframe overall was unremarkable. In Australia the common length of PhD is around 3. During this time I kept a timesheet.
I know this might seem strange, but in a previous job I needed to log my work, and I liked the way it helped keep track of where I spent my time. This is how I spent my time overall: The data categories are: The average time split between these different tasks is shown in the pie chart and table below.
In these numbers I have accounted for annual leave assuming 3 weeks per year not 4 as allocatedpublic holidays approx. The time split between these categories is quite variable both week-to-week and over the whole duration.
There are sustained busy periods leading up to milestones, but also periods where work dropped off due to life events, holidays, or other random reasons. There are big chunks of time spent on professional activities in the middle period, which included a collaborative project writing a paper with early career colleagues from across the country over 1.
Overall though, the hours I worked really went up and down week, which seems to be a normal thing, but often something we beat ourselves up over. My PhD was in the social sciences in an interdisciplinary field of water and environmental governance.
I was fortunate to have great and supportive supervisors, although overall, I felt that my research was of little interest both in my department and the university as a whole.
I was in some ways fortunate to be a position that was flexible regarding long hours, and without anyone relying on me. I was very fortunate to be in a good financial position with an Australian Government scholarship, a state government top-up scholarship, and an operating expenses grant.
Hence I had no income for the last months of my candidature and afterwards. Does this mean that I should not have done as many professional activities and finished on time? Could I have worked smarter and saved time by carefully studying these graphs more along the way?
Secondly, the professional activities especially collaborative side-projects were really valuable for feeding back into the ideas of my research and getting informal feedback and personal support in my work. Thirdly, many of the professional activities helped me build skills on my CV, build my research network and make important contacts, and led to extremely important career opportunities.
My career path post-PhD has been quite unpredictable, but I trace my current postdoctoral role in Europe back to professional activities during my PhD. In a year or so into my PhD I applied to attend a training workshop for early career researchers.
I was accepted, and following the workshop several of us participants collaborated on writing a paper together over the next 18 months. During these interactions, one group member randomly mentioned an upcoming conference in Germany 5 days before the deadline for abstracts.
I ended up successfully applying to present my work at this conference, where I randomly met a highly-regarded European researcher, who extended an invitation to visit his institute, which I took up after I completed my PhD to collaborate on a grant proposal although largely without funding support.
This proposal was eventually successful and hence 3 or 4 years down the track, I am able to follow my dream to work in Europe.
So in this case trying to save time in the short-term by cutting out a seemingly extraneous activity would have been completely unproductive in the long-term.
This implies that stuff beyond your core PhD work matters. In fact, I firmly believe that as PhD students we should think and act far beyond our core PhD work, use the opportunity to develop a wide range of professional skills, and contribute to building healthier research cultures in our organisations e.
Therefore, in answer to my question, how long does it take to do a PhD? For me, the answer was average! But how I spent was time was what really mattered.
Thanks James — your diligence gives us all something to think about! How do you spend your time? Have you measured it?Pay for essay writing online a fair price and choose an academic writer who will provide an original and complete well-researched college paper in return.
We can write you a perfect assignment that ideally matches your requirements in no time. We work day and night to .
A doctorate (from Latin docere, "to teach") or doctor's degree (from Latin doctor, "teacher") or doctoral degree (from the ancient formalism licentia docendi) is an academic degree awarded by universities that is, in most countries, a research degree that qualifies the holder to teach at the university level in the degree's field, or to work in a specific profession.
A Custom Writing Service That Fulfill Your Requirements We can relieve you from any kind of writing: essays, business projects, thesis, term papers, coursework, research papers, dissertations. HOW TO WRITE A LITERATURE REVIEW. Will G Hopkins PhD.
Department of Physiology and School of Physical Education, University of Otago, Dunedin , New Zealand. Texas Major Hurricane Intensity Not Related to Gulf Water Temperatures August 29th, by Roy W.
Spencer, Ph. D. Time for the Slayers to Put Up or Shut Up May 10th, by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.